Corporate Social Responsibility - Hilton - 3197 Words

Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate social responsibility (CSR, also called corporate conscience, corporate citizenship, social performance, or sustainable responsible business/ Responsible Business) is a form of corporate self- regulation integrated into a business model. CSR policy functions as a built-in, self-regulating mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards, and international norms. CSR is a process with the aim to embrace responsibility for the companys actions and encourage a positive impact through its activities on the environment, consumers, employees, communities, stakeholders and all other members of the public sphere who may†¦show more content†¦in developing economies); projects that support sustainable economic growth by increasing opportunities for emerging local businesses to succeed in the global value chain; disaster preparation and resiliency; critical services including housing and hunger/food insecuri ty; †¢ Culture: includes education programs that foster cultural heritage, preservation and restoration of historic or cultural monuments; projects that bridge diverse cultures and foster inclusiveness and diplomacy; support for local sourcing and goods; †¢ Sustainability: includes projects that assist in the protection, conservation and restoration of natural resources and habitats; projects that educate and inform the public about sustainability; support for sustainable sourcing and purchasing. Unsolicited Requests for Funding: Given their focus areas, in general they do not accept unsolicited funding requests and prefer to invite requests for proposals that contribute to their strategic program areas. It will be the responsibility of the Corporate Responsibility team to invite such requests and these requests will be reviewed and evaluated by a Contributions Review Committee under the supervision of the Corporate Responsibility team. Opportunities At Hilton Worldwide,Show MoreRelatedCorporate Social Responsibility : Csr Essay1064 Words   |  5 Pages â€Æ' Table of Content Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Understanding the Importance of CSR 4 Corporate Social Responsibility Audit 6 Findings 6 Conclusion 7 Recommendations 7 Reference List 8 Executive Summary After investigating the current situation, I found that the poor working conditions and underpayment reduce loyalty and employees’ satisfaction, employees feeling pressure with high workload and poor working conditions, substandard waste disposal methods causedRead MoreMore Friendliness Administration Positions Are Being Taken By Alumni Of Neighborliness Administration1528 Words   |  7 Pagesdoubt of enormous business. Corporate social obligation obliges associations to exhibit capable business lead that does no mischief in the commercial center, in the work environment, in the group they work in, and to the regular habitat (Roberts, 2007). The activities of business effect the nearby, national, and worldwide group, so organizations have an obligation to guarantee that the effect is sure (Paton, 2007). What is CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility includes making business progressRead MoreCorporate Social Responsibilities Essay1603 Words   |  7 PagesOn September 13, 1970, Milton Friedman wrote and article, Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. One of Milton’s theories suggested that the only legitimate incentive for a corporation to exist is to maximize its profits with its shareholders. As companies progress over time, so does the reason for the company existence. â€Å"What makes a stake holder?† Isabel Hilton (GE Stakeholders 2009) â€Å"What makes a stake holder? If you take a broad view of business then almost anyone whoRead MoreDevelopment of Triple Bottom Line Reporting and how this will Impact Financial Reporting and the Conceptual Framework2493 Words   |  10 PagesProfit seeking firms will not spend any dollar for non-value adding processing. (Smith, Thorne and Hilton, 2006) However, even with the lack of regulation, many organisations voluntary publicly release information about their social and environmental performance. (Deegan, 2009) According to Richard (1993) finding, investors intent to choose the company investing whether it demonstrates that is a market leadership or offer above average growth or bring in strong management. However, there are fewRead MoreCreating A Diverse And Inclusive Work Environment992 Words   |  4 Pages 2016). Diversity-Leaders need to know that they have to build accountability into their systems with regard to their managers taking responsibility for creating a diverse and inclusive work environment. Diversity initiatives can have important and interesting social justice benefits, but the real reason leaders pursue diversity programs is for innovation. Hilton Worldwide has any hotels and resorts across the globe with many background and variety of culture, and also has many guest travelling ofRead MoreHilton Hotel1075 Words   |  5 PagesHilton’s suppliers The touches that make Hilton Worldwide. Their supply management professionals in corporate offices and their six regional offices negotiate and implement contracts and agreements with suppliers of products and services in three key areas – Food amp; Beverage (Famp;B), Guest Rooms and Public Space, and Property Operations ------------------------------------------------- Food amp; Beverage Hilton Supply Management works closely with national and regional food and beverageRead MoreTransformation Is Run By Ceo Carole Anne Hilton1551 Words   |  7 Pagesand the social and economic capacity among First Nations communities. Their entire development and business goal is to establish governing structures, managing systems, and business development for First Nations people in order to establish a bright and structured future. Transformation is run by CEO Carole Anne Hilton who is driven by her ancestry and her passion to help struggling people. Hilton built the company off of the foundation of social and economic needs. Conventionally, Hilton runs herRead MoreMy Internship At The Hilton1130 Words   |  5 PagesDuring my internship at the Hilton, I have discovered hands on experience in the field I desire to have a degree in and hopefully land a job in after graduation. The amount of information I gathered and retained from this time frame in unimaginable. I thoroughly have enjoyed my stay at this hotel. The staff has been nothing but friendly and understanding. Everyone is willing to assist and direct me to the accurate direction to following proper procedures. Personally, if I could stay longer then IRead MoreInternational And Domestic Hospitality Companies1180 Words   |  5 Pagesimplementing eco-friendly initiatives is Hilton Worldwide. Hilton Worldwide is one of the largest global hospitality companies today, consisting of more than 4,500 hotels in 97 countries. Hilton’s history dates back nearly 100 years, and they continue to be one of the fastest growing companies in the hospitality industry. Part of the reason Hilton Worldwide continues to grow is their commitment to corporate social and environmental responsibility. Hilton Worldwide takes a comprehensive approachRead MoreIndividual Assessment Cover Sheet / Plagiarism Declaration Form8448 Words   |  34 Pages9 SERVICE: 9 INVESTIGATE THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA: 9 RECOMMENDATION: 10 TOPIC 6 - BARS 10 BARS: 11 .DAN MURPHY’S 11 TOP SELLERS: 11 CLIENT CATEGORY: 12 BEST PROMOTION 12 EFFECTS OF CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL ON HEALTH 12 SURVEY 2013 12 TOPIC 7 – MICE: MEETINGS, INCENTIVES, CONVENTIONS, AND EXHIBITIONS 13 MICE IN SYDNEY 13 HILTON HOTEL 13 FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON HOTEL 13 PARK HYATT SYDNEY 13 COMPETITION ANALYSIS: 14 COMPARISON 15 TOPIC 8 - CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE GLOBAL HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY

Doing the Right Thing free essay sample

The Runaway Trolley Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car hurtling down the track at sixty miles an hour. Up ahead you see ve workers standing on the track, tools in hand. You try to stop, but you can’t. The brakes don’t work. You feel desperate, because you know that if you crash into these ve workers, they will all die. (Let’s assume you know that for sure. ) Suddenly, you notice a side track, o to the right. There is a worker on that track, too, but only one. You realize that you can turn the trolley car onto the side track, killing the one worker, but sparing the ve. What should you do? Most people would say, â€Å"Turn! Tragic though it is to kill one innocent person, it’s even worse to kill ve. † Sacri cing one life in order to save ve does seem the right thing to do. Now consider another version of the trolley story. This time, you are not the driver but an onlooker, standing on a bridge overlooking the track. (This time, there is no side track. Down the track comes a trolley, and at the end of the track are ve workers. Once again, the brakes don’t work. The trolley is about to crash into the ve workers. You feel helpless to avert this disaster—until you notice, standing next to you on the bridge, a very heavy man. You could push him o the 22 JUSTICE bridge, onto the track, into the path of the oncoming trolley. He would die, but the ve workers would be saved. (You consider jumping onto the track yourself, but realize you are too small to stop the trolley. ) Would pushing the heavy man onto the track be the right thing to do? Most people would say, â€Å"Of course not. It would be terribly wrong to push the man onto the track. † Pushing someone o a bridge to a certain death does seem an awful thing to do, even if it saves ve innocent lives. But this raises a moral puzzle:Why does the principle that seems right in the rst case—sacri ce one life to save ve—seem wrong in the second? If, as our reaction to the rst case suggests, numbers count—if it is better to save ve lives than one—then why shouldn’t we apply this principle in the second case, and push? It does seem cruel to push a man to his death, even for a good cause. But is it any less cruel to kill a man by crashing into him with a trolley car? Perhaps the reason it is wrong to push is that doing so uses the man on the bridge against his will. He didn’t choose to be involved, after all. He was just standing there. But the same could be said of the person working on the side track. He didn’t choose to be involved, either. He was just doing his job, not volunteering to sacri ce his life in the event of a runaway trolley. It might be argued that railway workers willingly incur a risk that bystanders do not. But let’s assume that being willing to die in an emergency to save other people’s lives is not part of the job description, and that the worker has no more consented to give his life than the bystander on the bridge has consented to give his. Maybe the moral di erence lies not in the e ect on the victims— both wind up dead—but in the intention of the person making the decision. As the driver of the trolley, you might defend your choice to divert the trolley by pointing out that you didn’t intend the death of the worker on the side track, foreseeable though it was; your purpose would still have been achieved if, by a great stroke of luck, the ve workers were spared and the sixth also managed to survive. DOING THE RIGHT THING 23 But the same is true in the pushing case. The death of the man you push o the bridge is not essential to your purpose. All he needs to do is block the trolley; if he can do so and somehow survive, you would be delighted. Or perhaps, on re ection, the two cases should be governed by the same principle. Both involve a deliberate choice to take the life of one innocent person in order to prevent an even greater loss of life. Perhaps your reluctance to push the man o the bridge is mere squeamishness, a hesitation you should overcome. Pushing a man to his death with your bare hands does seem more cruel than turning the steering wheel of a trolley. But doing the right thing is not always easy. We can test this idea by altering the story slightly. Suppose you, as the onlooker, could cause the large man standing next to you to fall onto the track without pushing him; imagine he is standing on a trap door that you could open by turning a steering wheel. No pushing, same result. Would that make it the right thing to do? Or is it still morally worse than for you, as the trolley driver, to turn onto the side track? It is not easy to explain the moral di erence between these cases— why turning the trolley seems right, but pushing the man o the bridge seems wrong. But notice the pressure we feel to reason our way to a convincing distinction between them—and if we cannot, to reconsider our judgment about the right thing to do in each case. We sometimes think of moral reasoning as a way of persuading other people. But it is also a way of sorting out our own moral convictions, of guring out what we believe and why. Some moral dilemmas arise from con icting moral principles. For example, one principle that comes into play in the trolley story says we should save as many lives as possible, but another says it is wrong to kill an innocent person, even for a good cause. Confronted with a situation in which saving a number of lives depends on killing an innocent person, we face a moral quandary. We must try to gure out which principle has greater weight, or is more appropriate under the circumstances. 24 JUSTICE Other moral dilemmas arise because we are uncertain how events will unfold. Hypothetical examples such as the trolley story remove the uncertainty that hangs over the choices we confront in real life. They assume we know for sure how many will die if we don’t turn— or don’t push. This makes such stories imperfect guides to action. But it also makes them useful devices for moral analysis. By setting aside contingencies—â€Å"What if the workers noticed the trolley and jumped aside in time? †Ã¢â‚¬â€hypothetical examples help us to isolate the moral principles at stake and examine their force. The Afghan Goatherds Consider now an actual moral dilemma, similar in some ways to the fanciful tale of the runaway trolley, but complicated by uncertainty about how things will turn out: In June 2005, a special forces team made up of Petty O cer Marcus Luttrell and three other U. S. Navy SEALs set out on a secret reconnaissance mission in Afghanistan, near the Pakistan border, in search of a Taliban leader, a close associate of Osama bin Laden. 7 According to intelligence reports, their target commanded 140 to 150 heavily armed ghters and was staying in a village in the forbidding mountainous region. Shortly after the special forces team took up a position on a mountain ridge overlooking the village, two Afghan farmers with about a hundred bleating goats happened u pon them. With them was a boy about fourteen years old. The Afghans were unarmed. The American soldiers trained their ri es on them, motioned for them to sit on the ground, and then debated what to do about them. On the one hand, the goatherds appeared to be unarmed civilians. On the other hand, letting them go would run the risk that they would inform the Taliban of the presence of the U. S. soldiers. As the four soldiers contemplated their options, they realized that they didn’t have any rope, so tying up the Afghans to allow time to nd a new hideout was not feasible. The only choice was to kill them or let them go free. One of Luttrell’s comrades argued for killing the goatherds: â€Å"We’re on active duty behind enemy lines, sent here by our senior commanders. We have a right to do everything we can to save our own lives. The military decision is obvious. To turn them loose would be wrong. †38 Luttrell was torn. â€Å"In my soul, I knew he was right,† he wrote in retrospect. â€Å"We could not possibly turn them loose. But my trouble is, I have another soul. My Christian soul. And it was crowding in on me. Something kept whispering in the back of my mind, it would be wrong to execute these unarmed men in cold blood. †39 Luttrell didn’t say what he meant by his Christian soul, but in the end, his conscience didn’t allow him to kill the goatherds. He cast the deciding vote to release them. (One of his three comrades had abstained. ) It was a vote he came to regret. About an hour and a half after they released the goatherds, the four soldiers found themselves surrounded by eighty to a hundred Taliban ghters armed with AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades. In the erce re ght that followed, all three of Luttrell’s comrades were killed. The Taliban ghters also shot down a U. S. helicopter that sought to rescue the SEAL unit, killing all sixteen soldiers on board. Luttrell, severely injured, managed to survive by falling down the mountainside and crawling seven miles to a Pashtun village, whose residents protected him from the Taliban until he was rescued. In retrospect, Luttrell condemned his own vote not to kill the goatherds. â€Å"It was the stupidest, most southern-fried, lamebrained decision I ever made in my life,† he wrote in a book about the experience. â€Å"I must have been out of my mind. I had actually cast a vote which I knew could sign our death warrant. . . . At least, that’s how I look back on those moments now. . . The deciding vote was mine, and it will haunt me till they rest me in an East Texas grave. † 40 Part of what made the soldiers’ dilemma so di cult was uncertainty about what would happen if they released the Afghans. Would 26 JUSTICE they simply go on their way, or would they alert the Taliban? But suppose Luttrell knew that freeing the goatherds would lead to a devastating battle result ing in the loss of his comrades, nineteen American deaths, injury to himself, and the failure of his mission? Would he have decided di erently? For Luttrell, looking back, the answer is clear: he should have killed the goatherds. Given the disaster that followed, it is hard to disagree. From the standpoint of numbers, Luttrell’s choice is similar to the trolley case. Killing the three Afghans would have saved the lives of his three comrades and the sixteen U. S. troops who tried to rescue them. But which version of the trolley story does it resemble? Would killing the goatherds be more like turning the trolley or pushing the man o the bridge? The fact that Luttrell anticipated the danger and still could not bring himself to kill unarmed civilians in cold blood suggests it may be closer to the pushing case. And yet the case for killing the goatherds seems somehow stronger than the case for pushing the man o the bridge. This may be because we suspect that—given the outcome—they were not innocent bystanders, but Taliban sympathizers. Consider an analogy: If we had reason to believe that the man on the bridge was responsible for disabling the brakes of the trolley in hopes of killing the workers on the track (let’s say they were his enemies), the moral argument for pushing him onto the track would begin to look stronger. We would still need to know who his enemies were, and why he wanted to kill them. If we learned that the workers on the track were members of the French resistance and the heavy man on the bridge a Nazi who had sought to kill them by disabling the trolley, the case for pushing him to save them would become morally compelling. It is possible, of course, that the Afghan goatherds were not Taliban sympathizers, but neutrals in the con ict, or even Taliban opponents, who were forced by the Taliban to reveal the presence of the American troops. Suppose Luttrell and his comrades knew for certain that the goatherds meant them no harm, but would be tortured by the Taliban DOING THE RIGHT THING 27 o reveal their location. The Americans might have killed the goatherds to protect their mission and themselves. But the decision to do so would have been more wrenching (and morally more questionable) than if they knew the goatherds to be pro-Taliban spies. Moral Dilemmas Few of us face choices as fateful as those that confronted the soldiers on the mountain or the witness to the runaway trolley. But wrestling with their dilemmas sheds light on the way moral argument can proceed, in our personal lives and in the public square. Life in democratic societies is rife with disagreement about right and wrong, justice and injustice. Some people favor abortion rights, and others consider abortion to be murder. Some believe fairness requires taxing the rich to help the poor, while others believe it is unfair to tax away money people have earned through their own e orts. Some defend a rmative action in college admissions as a way of righting past wrongs, whereas others consider it an unfair form of reverse discrimination against people who deserve admission on their merits. Some people reject the torture of terror suspects as a moral abomination unworthy of a free society, while others defend it as a last resort to prevent a terrorist attack. Elections are won and lost on these disagreements. The so-called culture wars are fought over them. Given the passion and intensity with which we debate moral questions in public life, we might be tempted to think that our moral convictions are xed once and for all, by upbringing or faith, beyond the reach of reason. But if this were true, moral persuasion would be inconceivable, and what we take to be public debate about justice and rights would be nothing more than a volley of dogmatic assertions, an ideological food ght. At its worst, our politics comes close to this condition. But it need not be this way. Sometimes, an argument can change our minds.   How, then, can we reason our way through the contested terrain of justice and injustice, equality and inequality, individual rights and the common good? This book tries to answer that question. One way to begin is to notice how moral re ection emerges naturally from an encounter with a hard moral question. We start with an opinion, or a conviction, about the right thing to do: â€Å"Turn the trolley onto the side track. Then we re ect on the reason for our conviction, and seek out the principle on which it is based: â€Å"Better to sacri ce one life to avoid the death of many. † Then, confronted with a situation that confounds the principle, we are pitched into confusion: â€Å"I thought it was always right to save as many lives as possible, and yet it seems wrong to push the man o the bridge (or to kill the unarmed goatherds). † Feeli ng the force of that confusion, and the pressure to sort it out, is the impulse to philosophy. Confronted with this tension, we may revise our judgment about the right thing to do, or rethink the principle we initially espoused. As we encounter new situations, we move back and forth between our judgments and our principles, revising each in light of the other. This turning of mind, from the world of action to the realm of reasons and back again, is what moral re ection consists in. This way of conceiving moral argument, as a dialectic between our judgments about particular situations and the principles we a rm on re ection, has a long tradition. It goes back to the dialogues of Socrates and the moral philosophy of Aristotle. But notwithstanding its ancient lineage, it is open to the following challenge: If moral re ection consists in seeking a t between the judgments we make and the principles we a rm, how can such re ection lead us to justice, or moral truth? Even if we succeed, over a lifetime, in bringing our moral intuitions and principled commitments into alignment, what con dence can we have that the result is anything more than a self-consistent skein of prejudice? The answer is that moral re ection is not a solitary pursuit but a public endeavor. It requires an interlocutor—a friend, a neighbor, a DOING THE RIGHT THING 29 comrade, a fellow citizen. Sometimes the interlocutor can be imagined rather than real, as when we argue with ourselves. But we cannot discover the meaning of justice or the best way to live through introspection alone. In Plato’s Republic, Socrates compares ordinary citizens to a group of prisoners con ned in a cave. All they ever see is the play of shadows on the wall, a re ection of objects they can never apprehend. Only the philosopher, in this account, is able to ascend from the cave to the bright light of day, where he sees things as they really are. Socrates suggests that, having glimpsed the sun, only the philosopher is t to rule the cave dwellers, if he can somehow be coaxed back into the darkness where they live. Plato’s point is that to grasp the meaning of justice and the nature of the good life, we must rise above the prejudices and routines of everyday life. He is right, I think, but only in part. The claims of the cave must be given their due. If moral re ection is dialectical—if it moves back and forth between the judgments we make in concrete situations and the principles that inform those judgments—it needs opinions and convictions, however partial and untutored, as ground and grist. A philosophy untouched by the shadows on the wall can only yield a sterile utopia. When moral re ection turns political, when it asks what laws should govern our collective life, it needs some engagement with the tumult of the city, with the arguments and incidents that roil the public mind. Debates over bailouts and price gouging, income inequality and a rmative action, military ser vice and same-sex marriage, are the stu of political philosophy. They prompt us to articulate and justify our moral and political convictions, not only among family and friends but also in the demanding company of our fellow citizens. More demanding still is the company of political philosophers, ancient and modern, who thought through, in sometimes radical and surprising ways, the ideas that animate civic life—justice and rights, obligation and consent, honor and virtue, morality and law. Aristotle, 30 JUSTICE Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and John Rawls all gure in these pages. But their order of appearance is not chronological. This book is not a history of ideas, but a journey in moral and political re ection. Its goal is not to show who in uenced whom in the history of political thought, but to invite readers to subject their own views about justice to critical examination—to gure out what they think, and why.

Violence in Sports Essay Paper Example For Students

Violence in Sports Essay Paper With the increase in society taking a stance against violence by many people, sports has become an areawhere some feel that the violent acts such as the hitting and fighting that occurs should be eliminated. You can not change something that has been around for so long because it would change the aspect of thegame to something completely different. The elimination of violence should not be done in sport becausethe violence is a part of the game which would only hurt its popularity. The reasons that the violence is occurring in sport is due to six theories according to JohnSchneider. The violence in sport mirrors the violence found in society, violence as the result ofeconomic incentives, the influence of crowd behavior on player violence, genetic causation for playeraggression, learning theory and player aggression, and psychological stress and player violenceThe theories of sport mirroring society, violence as a result of economic incentive, and theinfluence of the crowd behavior are the theories that I feel are responsible for the increasing violencein sports. Most people when involved in a highly stressful situation where violence is around wouldprobably resort to a fight to resolve their differences. In sport, why should we expect any difference. We will write a custom essay on Violence in Sports Paper specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now In events such as hockey games, where people are expected to hit and make body contact, sooner or later afight will break out and the fans will yell and scream for their favorite player involved. Likeanything, if people around us are applauding us for a certain act we have done, we will try to do it overso that we will continue to be praised. In sports, there are some players whose only role on the team isto protect and enforce the unwritten rules of the game such as in hockey where it is not right to fightor hit a Wayne Gretezy or Mario Lemieux type of star player!. His economic incentive is to protect the team and if he does not, a new line of work might be in thefuture. All three of those theories relate closely to the role of the fighter in sport and why it isthat he does commit the acts of violence. When leagues such as the National Football League (NFL) or the National Hockey League (NHL) areasked to try and remove the violence from their sport, they are hesitant because it is not what the fanswant. Bryant and Zillman report that television viewers enjoy NFL plays more when they are rough andWhy should these leagues remove the violence that is occurring if they are making money andkeeping people employed. The fans of the games want to see these situations and eliminating the fightingaspect would hurt the support. When I watch a hockey game or any other sporting event with contact,there is nothing better than seeing a good fight take place. One of the best-selling videos in parts ofthe Northeastern United States has been a collection of the best fights in the NHL (McPherson 294). Even former NHL president Clarence Campbell felt that the violence taking place in his sport wascalled for and was reluctant to remove the fighting and the body contact because he knew that it is whatFighting is a well-established safety valve for players. If violence ceases to exist, it will not bethe same game. Insofar as fighting is part of the show, we certainly sell it. We do not promote it. We tolerate it and we bring it under disciplinary control which we believe satisfies the public (Snyder Its better that the violence take place between two willing combatants such as in sports than ina situation involving spousal abuse where the majority of the times the female is being attacked againsther consent. Allowing people not to be able vent their frustrations through sport in my mind wouldincrease the violence that is happening away from the playing field. It is a known fact that sports doeskeep kids off the street and away from gangs which is why you see so many athletic and boxing clubs beingrun out of the inner city. It is allowing the youth to take that hostility out on a willing participantwho is ready and consenting rather than against an innocent bystander. .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 , .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .postImageUrl , .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 , .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:hover , .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:visited , .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:active { border:0!important; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:active , .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4 .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud868482f5bb6523d9e3fcf4ea2faa9c4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Womens Right EssaySome individuals have gone as far as saying that sport is creating a deviant subculture wherethese athletes are becoming the opposite of what was intended for them. The emphasis in formalizedsport on victory may, in fact, promote deviant behavior and poor sportsmanship (Snyder 101). I would have to totally disagree with the above quote because being an athlete myself, I cannever recall a time when I could have related my deviant behavior to my sporting past. Sports does notpromote poor sportsmanship, it creates a drive to succeed within yourself and to try to do the best atwhatever you do whether it be in sports, school or at a job. The violence that is occurring today is not occurring more than it was ten or twenty years agolike some people might suggest, it is only being shown and talked about more by the mass media. If thereis one group to blame for the increase in violence I feel that it would be the media, not the athletesthemselves. If you turn on the television to watch a sportscast, it will always glorify an act ofa hit of the night or repeats of some type of fight whether it be in hockey, boxing or a bench-clearingbrawl in baseball. I can recall on numerous occasions where the media has hyped up a hockey gameinvolving two tough guys and creating a hysteria in sporting world wanting to see the outcome of thefight. Is this wrong for the media to be encouraging and glorifying the violence in sport? I dontthink so because the fans want to see it and like it or not, it is here to stay. Look at sports like boxing for example, who relies on the media to increase the sports fansinterest in an upcoming match. Wh en you can only fit approximately 17,000 people into a Las Vegasboxing arena, the money is not made at the gate (Lunney 39). Millions and millions of dollars aregathered from pay-per- view television where again millions of spectators are waiting to see the outcomeof a match like the one two weeks ago involving Mike Tyson and Frank Bruno where Tyson made an easy $30million Lunney 39). We as society are attracted to this sort of sport violence and there is nothing weShould we take steps to discourage the violence in sports is a question that is being asked todaydue to the glorification of certain events like University of Moncton-University of Prince Edward Islandhockey game where a referee was assaulted on the ice after disallowing then allowing the same goal. Thiskind of violence occurs very little in the sport of hockey considering the amount of games that areplayed throughout the year. Sure there are acts like these but they are not the norm. It would be hardto eliminate violence that is in sport because it has been there for so long and is a part of the game. Fans do not want to see it be removed because it is sometimes the only part of the game that isinteresting if the game is dull. Players know that a good, solid hit or a bit fight can sometimes putmomentum on their side giving them extra drive to pull ahead in the game. Violence in sport is nothaving a negative effect on society, it is only allowing fans to !enjoy themselves while they are watching a particular sport. Yes there are instances where players andfans do go overboard and get carried away causing fights and sometimes riots, but it is not very often. When it does happen, it is glorified so that people think sports are played by bozos and goons who canonly fight. The violence that is in sport is here to stay and should be left that way so that the realfans who know what is going on can enjoy the sport that they have took an interest in instead of mediatypes and others who do not have a clue in what they are talking about when saying that the violence inBibliographyAberdeen, R. (1995, Mar.). Participant observation and research into football hooliganism:Reflections on the problems of entree and everyday risks. Sociology of SportJournalFamily Violence Prevention Fund. Calling foul: Sports anddomestic violence. .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 , .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .postImageUrl , .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 , .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:hover , .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:visited , .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:active { border:0!important; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:active , .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4 .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua49dd2a489da888b5c3cd8cbd4f8d4a4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Sex Education Does It Really Work Essayhttp//.www.icg.apc.org/fund/men/sports. htmlGantz, W. (1995, Mar.). Fanship and the television sportsviewing experience. Sociology ofLapchick, R. (Ed.). (1986). Fractured focus. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books. Lunney, D. (1996, March 26). Refs on run: Abuse of officials onrise in Manitoba. Winnipeg Sun, p. McPherson, B. D., Curtis, J. E., ; Loy, J. W. (1989). The socialsignificance of sport. Champaign,Messner, M. A., ; Sabo, D. F. (1994). Sex, violence and power insports. Freedom, CA.: The CrossingSnyder, E. E., ; Spreitzer, E. A. (1983). Social aspects ofsport. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.:In this essay, the main topic was to show that although there is an increase in the amount ofviolence that is occuring in sports, it should not be eliminated from the games that it is being used in. Although there has been a call by some to have violence such as fighting and body contacteliminated from games such as hockey, the reason that it is good to have these acts is because it allowsyou to vent your fustration out on a willing opponent instead of taking t out on an unsuspectingThe violence that is being used in sports should stay in the game due to its popularity and forthose who believe that it should be eliminated should learn what they are talking about before suchcomments are made to ruin the gam es that we enjoy. Bibliography:blah,blah

Free Essays on Retail; Victorias Secret

Introduction Victoria’s Secret is a growing company. As the years go by women’s liberation has brought a large movement of women in business. It is fashion that brings out the feminine side of the twentieth century workingwoman. Vicky’s started out with just a line of lingerie but began too expand its horizons finding a need to meet the necessities of women renovating the beautiful housewife and converting her into the beautiful workingwoman. Victoria's Secret is one of the most powerful, sexy brands in the world; they’re the leading specialty retailer of intimate apparel and beauty products, also offering sleepwear, hosiery and fashion. They are headquartered in Columbus, Ohio and Victoria's Secret Lingerie operates 881 stores across the country. As one of the world's most recognized brands, they are committed to representing the highest standards in products, their services and most importantly, their people. They view their associates as the most critical component to keeping the brand's promise to deliver glamorous, intimate, pampering and indulgent experiences. They are a team of associates who have built the Victoria's Secret brand into the leading specialty retailer of intimate apparel over the last 20 years. Their team believes strongly that professional relationships are built on honesty, integrity, openness, respect, fairness and inclusion. (http://careers.limitedbrands.com/index.jsphttp://careers.limitedbrands.com/index.jsp) Victoria’s Secret is a store for a woman that gives her an opportunity to extenuate who and what a woman really is about. This store belongs to the Limited Brands Inc, which is a group of stores that belongs to the same holder. These stores include: Express Men/Women Structure The Limited New York & Company Lerner New York Bath and Body Works Victoria’s Secret Victoria’s Secret Beauty Victoria’s Secret Direct The White Barn Candle Co. Victoria’s Secret ... Free Essays on Retail; Victoria's Secret Free Essays on Retail; Victoria's Secret Introduction Victoria’s Secret is a growing company. As the years go by women’s liberation has brought a large movement of women in business. It is fashion that brings out the feminine side of the twentieth century workingwoman. Vicky’s started out with just a line of lingerie but began too expand its horizons finding a need to meet the necessities of women renovating the beautiful housewife and converting her into the beautiful workingwoman. Victoria's Secret is one of the most powerful, sexy brands in the world; they’re the leading specialty retailer of intimate apparel and beauty products, also offering sleepwear, hosiery and fashion. They are headquartered in Columbus, Ohio and Victoria's Secret Lingerie operates 881 stores across the country. As one of the world's most recognized brands, they are committed to representing the highest standards in products, their services and most importantly, their people. They view their associates as the most critical component to keeping the brand's promise to deliver glamorous, intimate, pampering and indulgent experiences. They are a team of associates who have built the Victoria's Secret brand into the leading specialty retailer of intimate apparel over the last 20 years. Their team believes strongly that professional relationships are built on honesty, integrity, openness, respect, fairness and inclusion. (http://careers.limitedbrands.com/index.jsphttp://careers.limitedbrands.com/index.jsp) Victoria’s Secret is a store for a woman that gives her an opportunity to extenuate who and what a woman really is about. This store belongs to the Limited Brands Inc, which is a group of stores that belongs to the same holder. These stores include: Express Men/Women Structure The Limited New York & Company Lerner New York Bath and Body Works Victoria’s Secret Victoria’s Secret Beauty Victoria’s Secret Direct The White Barn Candle Co. Victoria’s Secret ...

Functions of the Apostrophe

Functions of the Apostrophe Functions of the Apostrophe Functions of the Apostrophe By Mark Nichol This post discusses the three primary functions of the apostrophe in the English language: the marking of the possessive case in nouns, the marking of the omission of one or more letters, and the marking of plurals of individual characters. (The obsolescence of apostrophes with abbreviations is also discussed.) Marking Possessives Apostrophes are employed in conjunction with the possessive s, as shown in the following examples: singular common nouns: â€Å"the farmer’s daughter† singular proper nouns that end in s: â€Å"Chris’ job† or â€Å"Chris’s job† (depending on which style one employs) plural common nouns: â€Å"the farmers’ daughters† plural common nouns that end in s: â€Å"the dogs’ bowls† plural proper nouns ending in s: â€Å"the Thompsons’ party† (no s at the end of the name); â€Å"the Simmonses’ car† (s at the end of the name) compound words: â€Å"mother-in-law’s tongue† separate possession: â€Å"John’s and Jane’s houses† joint possession: â€Å"John and Jane’s house† Note, in the case of proper nouns ending in s, the distinction between the first example, which refers to a party hosted by the Thompsons, and the usage Thompson’s, which refers to something belonging to Thompson. Lack of attention to this distinction is the cause of frequent errors in signage, as when a sign referring to the inhabitants of a residence reads, â€Å"The Thompson’s.† This truncation of â€Å"the Thompson’s house† literally indicates that it is the house of the Thompson and therefore is incorrect; it should read, â€Å"The Thompsons’.† Irregular plural nouns such as mice are treated according to the pertinent rule above, as in â€Å"The mice’s whiskers twitched with curiosity.† Also, nouns that are plural in form but singular in meaning technically take an apostrophe with no s (â€Å"the scissors’ handle,† though â€Å"the handle of the scissors† is easier to read and say). This rule applies to similar proper nouns (â€Å"Highland Estates’ bylaws†). Another exception is in the phrase â€Å"for goodness’ sake.† Attributive forms, as opposed to possessive forms, do not take an apostrophe (â€Å"veterans affairs†). The distinction is subtle, but test for the correct form by determining whether the phrase refers to an entity that exists for a given group (â€Å"veterans affairs†) or belongs to it or is organized by it (â€Å"farmers’ market†). Names of holidays should be styled according to who or what they honor: â€Å"Mother’s Day† is treated as such, for example, because although the day is for all mothers, one traditionally honored only one’s own mother, while Presidents’ Day commemorates all presidents. (â€Å"Veterans Day† is an anomaly.) Insertion or omission of apostrophes is also inconsistent in proper names in general, especially in geographical locations (â€Å"Pikes Peak,† but â€Å"Martha’s Vineyard’) or names of entities such as companies and organizations (Barclays, but McDonald’s). When an italicized term takes the possessive form, the apostrophe and the s are not italicized (as in â€Å"The Wizard of Oz’s enduring charm†). Contraction Apostrophes mark elision of one or more letters or numbers, as shown in the following examples: don’t (â€Å"do not†) o’clock (â€Å"of the clock†) c’mon (â€Å"come on†) let’s (â€Å"let us†) l’il (little) OK’d (in place of OKed) ’tis (â€Å"it is†) will-o’-the-wisp (will-of-the-wisp) â€Å"rock ’n’ roll† (â€Å"rock and roll†) f’c’stle (forecastle) O’Hara (â€Å"of the Hara,† from Gaelic Eaghra) ’60s (1960s) Many writers are confused about this function in some usage, erroneously apostrophizing possessive pronouns such as its (resulting in the erroneous it’s) and plural nouns such as apples (confusing them for possessive forms, as in a sign reading â€Å"Apple’s on sale†). Also, plural possessives pertaining to time frames are often mistakenly rendered as singular possessives (â€Å"two week’s notice†) or as plurals (â€Å"two weeks notice†); the proper form is â€Å"two weeks’ notice,† because the notice â€Å"belongs† to two weeks. (Note, however, the absence of an apostrophe in the phrase â€Å"two weeks late† because weeks is plural but not possessive.) Another frequent error is confusion of use of the apostrophe as the first character in a term. When contracting a word by beginning with an apostrophe, as in ’tis and â€Å"rock ’n’ roll,† or when contracting a number representing a four-digit year to the last two digits, as in the last example in the list above, precede it with an apostrophe- not an open single quotation mark (‘)- but indicate a range of years with a plural s alone (1960s), not with an apostrophe and an s; reserve that form for possessives (â€Å"1960’s most significant event,† in which a year, not a decade, is under discussion). Also, an apostrophe should follow a number, whether spelled out or in numeral form, only in a possessive sense or as a contraction, as in â€Å"The 4’s diagonal line is sometimes formed vertically† or â€Å"This hundred’s a counterfeit bill.† Plurals of Individual Characters An exception is made for using possessives to indicate plurals of lowercase letters, as in â€Å"Mind your p’s and q’s,† â€Å"Label the x’s and y’s,† and â€Å"There are two m’s in accommodate.† Also, the first of these examples shows an additional exception, one to the style rule that letters are italicized when employed to refer to themselves, as in â€Å"Write an s in the square and an r in the rectangle.† (Normally, plurals of uppercase letters do not feature an apostrophe- and are not italicized- as in â€Å"the three Rs† and â€Å"I got three As, two Bs, and a C on my report card.†) Apostrophes with Abbreviations Apostrophes at one time were employed with a following s to indicate plurals of nouns styled as initials followed by periods, as in M.D.’s to indicate more than doctor or R.S.V.P.’s to refer to multiple responses to an invitation, because although those forms look awkward, M.D.s and R.S.V.P.s appear even more so. However, use of periods with initials is becoming obsolete, and an apostrophe in MDs and RSVPs is unnecessary. (Many newer coinages such as CDs and DVDs generally postdate widespread usage of periods in initialisms.) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Punctuation category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Incorrect Pronunciations That You Should AvoidIs There a Reason â€Å"the Reason Why† Is Considered Wrong?10 Writing Exercises to Tighten Your Writing

Experimentation, Research and Consent for Ethics in Healthcare class Essay - 1

Experimentation, Research and Consent for Ethics in Healthcare class - Essay Example The next question which was raised to importance was when there was no such statement and there existed conflicting interest between the guardians of the patient then whose say would hold importance, that of the spouse or the parents? Along with these two questions, when the media got active a third conflict arose, regarding the rights of the disabled, whether their condition could be misconstrued to be an accent against pro life treatment? The hype was addressed by the then President of the US by passing a bipartisan Bill via which he had invalidated the ruling of the state judge by passing the matter to the federal courts. The reason why this was done was because it was felt by the Senate and the House of Representatives who had passed the Bill that the matter involved Terri’s Constitutional rights.1 The biggest conflict which came into being was also regarding the case being a right to die case or the disability rights case! But life cannot be charted into black and white words, and that’s what public opinion forced the courts to consider-ethical questions. Every person has the right to choose against medical treatment, against any sort of bodily intrusion. Then there is the right to life and personal liberty in contrast to the state’s right of preserving health and its duty to not allow people to commit suicide. This is called the duty of the state to maintain the sanctity of life. To add to this debate, many argued that the basic provision of food and water should not be removed as it is not covered within the ambit of medical treatment and as such law regarding the medical perspective could not guide removal of pipes which ensured regular basic nutrition. The third issue that was raised was whether a doctor is capable to decide on the issue about a miraculous breakthrough in a patient’s condition, especially when the same is steady if not improving. On removal of medicines which reduce

Transport of gas Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Transport of gas - Coursework Example 89). This further buttresses the high affinity for oxygen of the fetal hemoglobin. Additionally, fetal hemoglobin lacks the interaction with 2,3-BPG. Due to a change on a single amino acid on the binding pocket of 2,3-BPG, it binds less to fetal hemoglobin (Hall, 2010, p.58). This phenomenon explains the high affinity of fetal hemoglobin for oxygen as compared to maternal adult hemoglobin. c) After birth, the fetal hemoglobin is replaced with adult hemoglobin. Therefore, the oxygen-dissociation curve shifts to the right. It confers advantage to the infant after birth because the adult hemoglobin readily gives out oxygen to the tissues as compared to fetal hemoglobin, despite the fact that fetal hemoglobin has a higher affinity for oxygen. It would prevent tissue ischemia (Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2013) b) An increase in the partial pressures of carbon dioxide will shift the curve to the right. Carbon dioxide reduces intracellular pH as a result of the formation of bicarbonate ion. Formation of bicarbonate releases a proton into plasma, therefore reducing pH which has an effect of shifting the curve to the right (Ganong, 2005, p. 90). Similarly, pH affects the oxygen-dissociation curve. A decrease in pH shifts the curve to the right. At molecular level, a high H+ concentration, some amino acids such as Histidine 164 exist in their protonated form predominantly. They; therefore, form ion pairs which maintains deoxyhaemoglobin in the T state. The T state of hemoglobin has a lower affinity for oxygen; therefore, with increased acidity levels, hemoglobin binds less oxygen. This phenomenon is known as the Bohr Effect(Hall, 2010, p.57).. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Fetal Hemoglobin (Hemoglobin F) Fact Sheet. Available from from Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene: http://phpa.dhmh.maryland.gov/genetics/SitePages/hemo_f.aspx [Accessed: